Towerco comparability · note 02
10 tower companies publish a net debt to EBITDA multiple. They run from 2.67x to 6.40x. The spread is real, but a large part of it is the definition, not the balance sheet.
Each multiple below is the company's own, read from its own document, with the page. None of them is adjusted here.
| Company | Leverage, as they define it | Period | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telesites | 2.67x | Q2-2026 | p21 |
| IHS Towers | 3.10x | FY2025 | p1 |
| Helios Towers | 3.40x | FY2025 | p1 |
| American Tower | 4.90x | FY2025 | p1 |
| Tower Bersama | 5.00x | FY2025 | p369 |
| INWIT | 5.20x | FY2025 | p5 |
| EuroTeleSites | 5.50x | FY2025 | p4 |
| Crown Castle | 5.90x | FY2025 | p1 |
| Cellnex | 6.28x | FY2025 | p19 |
| SBA Communications | 6.40x | FY2025 | p16 |
A credit screen sorts that column and stops. The next two sections are why it should not.
Ground leases are the tower industry's largest operating cost. Under IFRS they sit below EBITDA, so a company can report EBITDA, or EBITDA after lease costs, and both are true. Where a company publishes both, here is the gap between them.
| Company | Period | EBITDA | After lease costs | Difference | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EuroTeleSites | FY2025 | 227.3m EUR | 151.3m EUR | −33% | p63, p63 |
| Vantage Towers | FY2026 (to Mar) | 984.5m EUR | 734.1m EUR | −25% | p118, p25 |
| Cellnex | FY2025 | 3,317.0m EUR | 2,484.0m EUR | −25% | p23, p23 |
| INWIT | FY2025 | 984.4m EUR | 785.9m EUR | −20% | p24, p24 |
The arithmetic is unforgiving. Divide the same net debt by the second column instead of the first and a 20% gap lifts a 5.0x multiple to 6.3x, and a 33% gap lifts it to 7.5x. Nothing about the company has changed.
Lease liabilities are debt to some definitions and not to others. US reporters keep operating leases off the debt line entirely. Where both figures are published, this is the size of what moves in or out.
| Company | Period | Net debt | Lease liabilities | Leases as % of net debt | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EuroTeleSites | FY2025 | 1,248.5m EUR | 379.8m EUR | 30% | p62, p48 |
| Crown Castle | FY2025 | 24,192.0m USD | 4,961.0m USD | 21% | p1, p1 |
| Helios Towers | FY2025 | 1,723.3m USD | 235.1m USD | 14% | p14, p14 |
| Cellnex | FY2025 | 20,765.0m EUR | 2,497.0m EUR | 12% | p24, p24 |
Our house rule is the one a rating analyst would recognise: leases out of the debt, EBITDA after lease costs. Like with like. Applying it to the 24 companies whose filings carry any of these figures gives this.
That is the finding, and it is not a complaint about the companies. On published information, a like-for-like leverage table across this sector cannot be built. What can be built is an honest one: each company's own multiple, its own definition beside it, and a recomputed figure only where the filing actually supports one. We never fill the gap with an estimate, because a credit committee cannot act on a number nobody published.
The current edition is a 43-page PDF and an Excel workbook covering 43 tower companies and 29 metrics. Every figure carries its page and the sentence it was read from.
Write and say which companies you cover.
[email protected]
A sample section goes out by reply. No list, no tracking on this page.